Key points, pages 194-196
Note the emphasis on historical materialism:
production and exchange are the bases of social structure, the distribution
of wealth is related to production and exchange of goods. The final
cause (a term Aristotle initiated) of social change is not:
The major example of such economic change
is that from the medieval world (feudalism:
recall the reference to William Penn as a "feudal land baron") to the bourgeois
world of 19th century capitalism, which has speedily ripped
apart the old ties of the medieval
world and replace them with:
|
|
|
| Handicraft, petty industry | Manufacture |
| Guilds | Factories |
| Nobility | Capitalists |
| Laborers (peasants, etc.)own means of production | Means of production concentrated and enlarged by capital and the bourgeoisie |
| Individualized means of production | Social means of production (social acts |
| Product becomes dommodity | Commodity |
| Spntaneous division of labor | Planned division of labor |
| Apprentices work for education, workers live of their labor | Workers work permanently for pay |
| Owner of instruments of labor owns product | Owner owns the product of labor of others: this is a "contradiction" between group production and capitalistic appropriation; workers possess nothing of their own. |
We will return to this topic. For the moment the key item to keep in mind is the distinction between the two great economic eras, and the brutal efficience with which capitalism has triumphed over feudalism